in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: don't { use Perl }
in thread don't { use Perl }
Perhaps I was a little broad with my pen. The SW hypothesis is
generally considered refuted in its strong form. Its weak form
continues to be investigated and does raise interesting questions
in the cognitive sciences. But the weak form is really nothing at all
like the strong form of the hypothesis, the weak form merely posits
an interaction between language and thought, the strong form asserts
that language is a limiting factor in the interaction.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
SW Hypothesis
by chaoticset (Chaplain) on Jun 11, 2002 at 04:20 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 11, 2002 at 07:40 UTC |
In Section
Meditations