Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: (ichi) 2.times('Re: ') Apocalypse 5 and regexes

by erikharrison (Deacon)
on Jun 08, 2002 at 03:01 UTC ( #172728=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to (ichi) 2.times('Re: ') Apocalypse 5 and regexes
in thread Apocalypse 5 and regexes

Actually this has been hashed (I say, I say, that's a joke there, boy) out pretty thoroughly on the language list. The braces are neccessary because otherwise anonymous hash constructors seem to have no syntactic justification, and we need the brackets for anonymous array constructors. Plus there are strong historical reasons at work.

As for Larry's braces fetish, this is absolutely not true. Having designed a few mini languages myself, I can tell you that there isn't anything else to use. Braces already mean code, parens mean args, brackets mean array ref, and angles are ugly, so filehandles got the diamond and hashes got the braces because in early Perl it was pretty clear what they meant. The only reason Larry seems to have a braces fetish is that alot of the Apocalypses have dealt with blocks - closure, special CAPITAL blocks, switch statements, embedded code.

Cheers,
Erik

Light a man a fire, he's warm for a day. Catch a man on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchet

  • Comment on Re: (ichi) 2.times('Re: ') Apocalypse 5 and regexes

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://172728]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (5)
As of 2022-05-26 13:52 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?



    Results (93 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?