Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Development at the speed of thought.

by vladb (Vicar)
on Jun 07, 2002 at 14:55 UTC ( [id://172550]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Development at the speed of thought.
in thread Development at the speed of thought.

Unfortunately no, there are factors outside of the script that come into play. Althought, I can't disclose a lot about the particular project, but the script 'analyzes' certain websites and indexes data in the database (in a dozen specially designed tables).

I agree with you on that rapid development may leave a number of holes uncovered. Althought, this being a 'throw-away' script (ment to run once and may be easily discarded once the job is done), any possibility of a break in security etc. is minimized ;). However, I too feel somewhat uneasy whenever I have to do a job like that ;/.

_____________________
$"=q;grep;;$,=q"grep";for(`find . -name ".saves*~"`){s;$/;;;/(.*-(\d+) +-.*)$/; $_=["ps -e -o pid | "," $2 | "," -v "," "];`@$_`?{print"+ $1"}:{print" +- $1"}&&`rm $1`; print$\;}

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re(3): Development at the speed of thought.
by cjf (Parson) on Jun 07, 2002 at 15:26 UTC
    Althought, this being a 'throw-away' script

    In my experience there's no such thing as a throw-away script. They always find a way to stick around until long after they were supposed to be discarded. A little extra planning and testing can save you a lot of time down the road (consider why you use strict).

    any possibility of a break in security etc. is minimized

    A security policy requiring basic security practices for all scripts should be followed even when deadlines are rushed. Placing a CGI script online without basic measures like taint checking (yes, that's an oversimplification, I know) should not be allowed to happen. Security is a tradeoff, but basic checks are almost always worth it.

Re: Re: Re: Development at the speed of thought.
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 07, 2002 at 16:58 UTC
    Althought, this being a 'throw-away' script (ment to run once and may be easily discarded once the job is done)

    ROTFLMAO :-) Please, Please, Please return to this thread and follow up when management inevitably asks you to add to, modify, or otherwise maintain this "throw-away" script. I'll be conservative and bet on 3 months or less, but I wouldn't be surprised if it happened before the first week-long run is even over :-)

      I'd be surprised if it made it to the point of completion.

      "Yeah, he's going to do it for me."

      "That's great! I wonder if he can add on a little whirlygig that flubbers my mareseedotes."

      "Why not? He's very helpful,"

      And once more into the breach, dear friends, once more!

      ()-()
       \"/
        `                                                     
      

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://172550]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-16 19:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found