![]() |
|
good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: Apocalypse 5 and regexesby graff (Chancellor) |
on Jun 06, 2002 at 04:28 UTC ( #172072=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I also think "gramex" is a bit clunky. But grammars mean
parsing. I assume that "parsex" would be a bit too "volatile"
and open to unrelated criticism.
The shorter "parex" might be about right; there might be wars about the "correct" pronunciation ("Parsing :: parex." "No! Parrot :: parex!"). So what? Eventually, of course, we'll all want to shoot the person who puns about the "parex par excellence!" for the thousandth time...
In Section
Meditations
|
|