Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: OT: Software & Liability

by cjf (Parson)
on May 20, 2002 at 22:58 UTC ( [id://168003]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: OT: Software & Liability
in thread OT: Software & Liability

I think the difference is important when judging risks associated with the use of the software in question.

I agree, but one thing you have to keep in mind is that many businesess/individuals will not have the time and/or expertise to ensure the quality of the software. An open source vendor who makes obviously false claims should be held just as liable as a closed-source software company.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re(3): OT: Software & Liability
by mojotoad (Monsignor) on May 21, 2002 at 06:54 UTC
    Yes, this is true. This is what should drive the market for 3rd party auditing and certification. Open source software makes such audits easier, more reliable, and most importantly, verifiable.

    Matt

[reply]

In Section Meditations

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?

www.com | www.net | www.org
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://168003]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-25 13:27 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found