Well, in my book, the Best of would surely consist of high-rated
questions and high-rated answers, so I would propose
that all threads
and discussion over a certain reputation are Best of Perlmonks.
But then, a discussion is nothing without the people taking
part in it. So all people's home nodes have to go in there,
if they took part in a discussion. Also at least the off-site
images, if there are any.
There remains the small problem of determining which nodes
got a high rating, or even simpler, finding for each discussion
a node with a desired reputation - and somehow, the reputation
of a node remains secret to everyone but to root,
the author and any voter. So my strategy would be to recruit
a faction of voters that report on "high reputation" nodes (through putting
a "probe" vote on the nodes, thus skewing the image a bit).
A second strategy (possibly extending the first) would be
to use the Perl Monks User Search node and search for posts ordered by
reputation. If you know the reputation of a certain node
you can guess the reputation of other nodes based on the
relative ranking of that node.
The quality of the Worst Nodes is not really high in
my book, but the same strategy could hold for collecting
the Worst of Perlmonks on your Palm.
Of course, you can always ask vroom to provide you
with the necessary information, but where's the fun then ? ;)
| 