in reply to Re: sort with fewest moves
in thread sort with fewest moves
In this case, it appears that yes, move(n,m) is the only operation with cost. (I'm not sure if it's cost is constant over all n,m. I think we're supposted to assume that it is.)
In purticular, this is going to be applied to a tape-library servicing robot, which only has one operation: switch the tapes in positions N and M. (move(n,m))
You're right about bubble-sort being a possiblity... but I don't think it's a good one. Remember that it isn't finding the sequence of moves that has to be done in constant space, it's the acautual movement of physical tapes.
TACCTGTTTGAGTGTAACAATCATTCGCTCGGTGTATCCATCTTTG ACACAATGAATCTTTGACTCGAACAATCGTTCGGTCGCTCCGACGC
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom