Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

RE: RE: whither Anonymous Monks?

by muppetBoy (Pilgrim)
on May 21, 2000 at 23:03 UTC ( #14069=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to RE: whither Anonymous Monks?
in thread whither Anonymous Monks?

I do not think that he has been moderated down because people disagreed with him, rather because the post was redundant. The question has been asked (probably several times) before and, as the first response indicates the issue has not gone away.
Would a valid solution to this issue be to supply a short reason for voting - and have this displayed for all to see? eg insightful/informative/original for +ve votes and redundant/obvious/offensive/pointless for -ve votes? (apologies to \. for the blatant rip-off of their ideas...)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: muppetboy, RE2: whither Anonymous Monks
by kudra (Vicar) on May 22, 2000 at 12:41 UTC
    Ah, redundancy. Redundant suggestions aren't bad though, I just think that the threads should be linked.

    cciulla mentioned this idea (comments for minus votes) in Voting. I still think it's a good idea.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://14069]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (3)
As of 2022-08-16 07:07 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found