Re: Making it clearer to say that a sub is defined within current package

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Making it clearer to say that a sub is defined within current package by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Apr 12, 2019 at 15:36 UTC
"...right-click on a name..." This doesn't work for hardboiled coders because they think using a mouse is for sissies. Best regards, Karl ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť `perl -MCrypt::CBC -E 'say Crypt::CBC->new(-key=>'kgb',-cipher=>"Blowfish")->decrypt_hex($ENV{KARL});'`Help	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: Making it clearer to say that a sub is defined within current package by LanX (Saint) on Apr 12, 2019 at 22:42 UTC
Such information can be triggered by cursor position too. At least in the mother of all IDEs ... Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}	[reply]
Re^4: Making it clearer to say that a sub is defined within current package by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Apr 13, 2019 at 09:47 UTC
"... the mother of all IDEs..." Probably this is emacs. May be i miss a command like `M-x goto-definition` in some mode? Best regards, Karl Update: Dialogue - a didactic device. ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť `perl -MCrypt::CBC -E 'say Crypt::CBC->new(-key=>'kgb',-cipher=>"Blowfish")->decrypt_hex($ENV{KARL});'`Help	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Making it clearer to say that a sub is defined within current package by LanX (Saint) on Apr 13, 2019 at 12:06 UTC
Re^5: Making it clearer to say that a sub is defined within current package by choroba (Cardinal) on Apr 13, 2019 at 10:26 UTC


Keep It Simple, Stupid
	PerlMonks