Re^5: accessing stashes

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: accessing stashes by morgon (Priest) on Mar 01, 2019 at 19:35 UTC
I know that. But I want one expression to determine the condition, I want to avoid (for reasons of pure idiocy) to have an extra assignment... So something like `print defined main::{$symbol}->{CODE} ? "yep": "nope";` [download] But I cannot do it...	[reply] [d/l]
Re^7: accessing stashes by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 01, 2019 at 19:55 UTC
It's `$glob && $glob{CODE}`, not `defined main::{$symbol}->*{CODE}`.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^8: accessing stashes by morgon (Priest) on Mar 01, 2019 at 20:18 UTC
First of all thanks a lot for solving my problem. But I was wondering if there is an expression that would avoid having a two-step solution (i.e. without first assigning a temporary $glob variable). So is there an expression that when I have a symbol ("hubba" say) I could do a `$some_convoluted_expression{hubba}->{CODE}` [download] (or something like that) to determine whether or not there is a sub-routine of that name in the main-package. But this is for bonus-points only...	[reply] [d/l]
Re^9: accessing stashes by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 01, 2019 at 20:46 UTC
Re^10: accessing stashes by morgon (Priest) on Mar 01, 2019 at 20:55 UTC


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks