Re^10: use of already eval()ed module (from string)

I am not bundling own perl but that's a good point. I guess check-summing a sub, even if it is possible, it is easy to break as afoken notes and hell to maintain. Maybe instead of bundling a perl executable, I can only bundle eval() and use override::eval to override any other eval?

Comment on Re^10: use of already eval()ed module (from string) Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: use of already eval()ed module (from string) by LanX (Saint) on Jan 15, 2019 at 12:49 UTC
> I can only bundle eval() and use override::eval to override any other eval? No idea, as I already said I could come up with half a dozen approaches to tweak Perl to reveal your "secrets". Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}	[reply]
Re^12: use of already eval()ed module (from string) by bliako (Monsignor) on Jan 15, 2019 at 13:36 UTC
brrrr	[reply]
Re^13: use of already eval()ed module (from string) by LanX (Saint) on Jan 15, 2019 at 15:31 UTC
It's not realistic to have the flexibility of Perl without the backdoors. You might bundle your own Perl and try to restrict it to the absolute minimal ... Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}	[reply]
Re^14: use of already eval()ed module (from string) by bliako (Monsignor) on Jan 16, 2019 at 23:15 UTC
Re^15: use of already eval()ed module (from string) by LanX (Saint) on Jan 17, 2019 at 00:09 UTC


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks