Re^3: Camel vs. Gopher

That may be so.

I see that you need more convincing, so here is another kill-feature of Go: Cross-compiling statically linked binaries.

On my linux-system I can build binaries for Mac (or Windows) that do not have any dependencies and will simply work when I copy ONE file to another machine running a different OS.

Do that with Perl.

Comment on Re^3: Camel vs. Gopher

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Camel vs. Gopher by pwagyi (Monk) on Apr 28, 2019 at 14:52 UTC
The comparison doesn't make sense since perl is not normally deployed in binary form (executable/dll). You're comparing statically compiled language with dynamic languages (like perl/python). You don't use Perl if you need such compiled language feature.	[reply]


Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer
	PerlMonks