Re^2: Camel vs. Gopher

Concurrency and shared data have been fun and easy and fast in Perl for quite some time, for example with MCE and MCE::Shared.

The way forward always starts with a minimal test.

Comment on Re^2: Camel vs. Gopher

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Camel vs. Gopher by marioroy (Prior) on Dec 13, 2018 at 01:49 UTC
See the MCE and MCE::Shared demonstration here.	[reply]
Re^3: Camel vs. Gopher by morgon (Priest) on Dec 12, 2018 at 22:00 UTC
That may be so. I see that you need more convincing, so here is another kill-feature of Go: Cross-compiling statically linked binaries. On my linux-system I can build binaries for Mac (or Windows) that do not have any dependencies and will simply work when I copy ONE file to another machine running a different OS. Do that with Perl.	[reply]
Re^4: Camel vs. Gopher by pwagyi (Monk) on Apr 28, 2019 at 14:52 UTC
The comparison doesn't make sense since perl is not normally deployed in binary form (executable/dll). You're comparing statically compiled language with dynamic languages (like perl/python). You don't use Perl if you need such compiled language feature.	[reply]