Converted a hardcoded version of yours to Inline::C, and it's pretty much the same performance as BrowserUK's Inline::C:
$ perl ./script
Benchmark: timing 500 iterations of Inline::C (AnomalousMonk), Inline::C (BrowserUK)...
Inline::C (AnomalousMonk): 6 wallclock secs ( 6.21 usr + 0.00 sys = 6.21 CPU) @ 80.52/s (n=500)
Inline::C (BrowserUK): 6 wallclock secs ( 6.14 usr + 0.00 sys = 6.14 CPU) @ 81.43/s (n=500)
Appreciate it! Conversion below:
int cd4( char *ccn ) {
int total = 0;
int i;
int co9[]={0,2,4,6,8,1,3,5,7,9};
int straight[]={1,3,5,7,9,11,13};
int adjusted[]={0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14};
for (i=0;i<7;i++) {
total += ccn[straight[i]]-48;
}
for (i=0;i<8;i++) {
total += co9[ccn[adjusted[i]]-48];
}
total *=9;
return total %10;
}