 Your skill will accomplishwhat the force of many cannot PerlMonks

Re^4: Faster Luhn Check Digit Calculation?

by BrowserUk (Patriarch)
 on Dec 01, 2018 at 07:31 UTC ( #1226590=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: Faster Luhn Check Digit Calculation?
in thread Faster Luhn Check Digit Calculation?

And an Inline::C implementation of the algorithm is 20x faster still:

#! perl -slw use strict; use Inline C => Config => BUILD_NOISY => 1; use Inline C => <<'END_C', NAME => '_luhn', CLEAN_AFTER_BUILD =>0; int c_luhn( char *s ) { int i, total = 0; for( i=0; i < 15; ++i ) { int d = s[ i ] - '0'; if( !( i & 1 ) ) { d *= 2; if( d > 9 ) d -= 9; } total += d; } total *= 9; return total % 10; } END_C use Time::HiRes qw[ time ]; my @samples = qw[ 4011350000000008 4011350000000016 4011350000000024 4011350000000032 4011350000000040 4011350000000057 4011350000000065 4011350000000073 4011350000000081 4011350000000099 ]; sub luhn { use integer; my \$s = \$_[ 0 ]; my \$total = 0; for my \$i ( 0 .. 14 ) { my \$d = substr( \$s, \$i, 1 ); unless( \$i & 1 ) { \$d *= 2; \$d -= 9 if \$d > 9; } \$total += \$d; } \$total *= 9; return chop \$total; } for ( @samples ) { print "\$_: ", luhn( substr \$_, 0, 15 ); } my \$start = time; for ( 401135000000000..401135000999999 ) { my \$chk = luhn( \$_ ); } printf "Took %.9f seconds.\n", time() - \$start; for ( @samples ) { print "\$_: ", c_luhn( \$_ ); } my \$start = time; for ( 401135000000000..401135000999999 ) { my \$chk = c_luhn( \$_ ); } printf "Took %.9f seconds.\n", time() - \$start;

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Suck that fhit

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Faster Luhn Check Digit Calculation?
by kschwab (Vicar) on Dec 01, 2018 at 15:24 UTC
That's funny, I was converting yours to Inline::C at the same time.
int cd2(char *number) { int i, d, total; total=0; for (i = 0; i<15; i++) { d=number[i]-48; if (!(i & 1)) { d *=2; if (d > 9) {d-=9;} } total+=d; } total *=9; return total % 10; }
And, it is a little faster, appreciate it.
\$perl ./script
Benchmark: timing 200 iterations of Inline::C (BrowserUK-His Conversion), Inline::C (BrowserUK-My Conversion), Inline::C (orig)...
Inline::C (BrowserUK-His Conversion):  2 wallclock secs ( 2.54 usr +  0.00 sys =  2.54 CPU) @ 78.74/s (n=200)
Inline::C (BrowserUK-My Conversion):  3 wallclock secs ( 2.51 usr +  0.00 sys =  2.51 CPU) @ 79.68/s (n=200)
Inline::C (orig):  3 wallclock secs ( 2.97 usr +  0.00 sys =  2.97 CPU) @ 67.34/s (n=200)

Unrolling the loop and using Anonymonk's lookup trick extracts another 5%:

int l[] = { 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 }; int c_luhn2( char *s ) { int total = 0; total += l[ s[ 0] - '0' ]; total += s[ 1] - '0'; total += l[ s[ 2] - '0' ]; total += s[ 3] - '0'; total += l[ s[ 4] - '0' ]; total += s[ 5] - '0'; total += l[ s[ 6] - '0' ]; total += s[ 7] - '0'; total += l[ s[ 8] - '0' ]; total += s[ 9] - '0'; total += l[ s - '0' ]; total += s - '0'; total += l[ s - '0' ]; total += s - '0'; total += l[ s - '0' ]; total *= 9; return total % 10; }

I doubt there is much fat left in there :)

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Suck that fhit

Looks fat to me ( just kidding :)

Is this any faster? Or does the compiler optimize away the differences?

int l[] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 }; int c_luhn2( char *s ) { return (( l[ (int)s[ 0] ] + s[ 1] + l[ (int)s[ 2] ] + s[ 3] + l[ (int)s[ 4] ] + s[ 5] + l[ (int)s[ 6] ] + s[ 7] + l[ (int)s[ 8] ] + s[ 9] + l[ (int)s ] + s + l[ (int)s ] + s + l[ (int)s ] - 7 * '0' ) * 9) % 10; }

Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1226590]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (3)
As of 2022-01-21 12:25 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
Voting Booth?
In 2022, my preferred method to securely store passwords is:

Results (57 votes). Check out past polls.

Notices?