Re^8: B::Xref buggy?

it's the same compound statement , if you want line numbers inside a while condition you need to put it inside do {}.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}

Comment on Re^8: B::Xref buggy?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: B::Xref buggy? by ikegami (Patriarch) on Nov 17, 2018 at 01:28 UTC
Exactly. Only in that scenario will Concise give a line number for it. And as it turns out, Concise and Xref will give the same line number in that scenario.	[reply]
Re^10: B::Xref buggy? by LanX (Saint) on Nov 17, 2018 at 01:46 UTC
> Concise and Xref will give the same line number in that scenario. Not at the moment. As it turned out Xref is buggy. see here again. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}	[reply]
Re^11: B::Xref buggy? by ikegami (Patriarch) on Nov 17, 2018 at 20:09 UTC
Yes, at the moment. I don't know why you link to that post because Concise doesn't give a number for the `my`, and Xref doesn't give a line number for the `while`.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^12: B::Xref buggy? by LanX (Saint) on Nov 17, 2018 at 20:12 UTC
Re^13: B::Xref buggy? by ikegami (Patriarch) on Nov 17, 2018 at 20:13 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks