I completely understand why the warning is emitted; I'm looking for answers as to how perl knows about the overwrite, considering the fact I've overwritten the symtab entry for it.
ps. This "dumb" website does links just fine.
| [reply]
[d/l] |
The post does not go through when I try to make that a link either using [] or html tags. I'm not sure I understand your question; Perl knows about it because you did it, and it checks for a mismatch in prototypes when that happens.
| [reply] |
"The post does not go through when I try to make that a link either using [] or html tags"
Fair enough. We do have a subset and mix of things here. [link_to_something|words to describe] is kind of backwards, but I digress.
Getting to the point, I understand that perl knows about it, there's no question there. My question is *how* perl knows about the prototype(s), after I have effectively pissed all over the symtab entry for the sub.
My question, more directly: Why and how does perl know that the sub I'm faking out (effectively), still keep reference to the prototypes that were involved in the subroutine I faked?
| [reply]
[d/l] |
