http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=1222030


in reply to Re: Breaking Tie::Hash into three modules
in thread Breaking Tie::Hash into three modules

How would that work? The three packages have different behavior that can't be combined.
  • Comment on Re^2: Breaking Tie::Hash into three modules

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Breaking Tie::Hash into three modules
by afoken (Chancellor) on Sep 10, 2018 at 19:50 UTC
    How would that work? The three packages have different behavior that can't be combined.

    Read Re: Breaking Tie::Hash into three modules again.

    shmem++ proposes to merge Tie::StdHash into Tie::Hash, Tie::StdArray into Tie::Array, and Tie::StdScalar into Tie::Scalar.

    Alexander

    --
    Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)

      The post reads:

      making the three modules into just one: Tie::Hash

      To me this means merging Tie::Hash, Tie::StdHash, and Tie::ExtraHash into a single package. That can't be done because Tie::ExtraHash uses a different internal storage, and Tie::Hash implements a CLEAR method that is useful for subclasses that don't use the same storage as Tie::StdHash.

      Similar things are true for the other modules. Tie::Scalar is maybe the only one that could be merged, but arguably the current Tie::Scalar package serves no purpose.