sundial did it better; and his was pathetic

• sundial spoils my Torquay seaside holiday

And yet only one contribution here looks like one of SunnyD’s posts in the way that matters most–

Reputation: -4 (+9 -13)
[download]

S'funny thing. When I first started calling out sundial's posts for what they were; there were a lot of people here who said I was too harsh, that I should give him the benefit of the doubt, that with encouragement and positive reenforcement he could be redeemed and brought into the fold.

It took a very long time before the majority saw what I saw, and recognised the insidious nature of his postings.

And so it is on this subject. 3 or 5 years from now if you still come around, you'll recognise I was right 12 years ago; and right again now.

Of course, it'll be too late by then, because it is already too late.

---

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Suck that fhit

> S'funny thing. When I first started calling out sundial's posts

Well you are regularly "calling out" people ...

I particularly remember your attacks against Tye and I miss his presence a lot.

> 3 or 5 years from now if you still come around, you'll recognise I was right

S'funny thing. How much longer do I have to wait to find out that Tye was damaging the monastery?

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}