Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors

by Perlbotics (Archbishop)
on Jul 25, 2018 at 16:31 UTC ( [id://1219275]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors

Good idea. Would it be possible to just tag the bad nodes, i.e. <div ... class="badnode">, when logged in? That would allow to customise the appearance individually using CSS.

EDIT: Thus, censorship or not is kept an individual decision.
Suggestion for default CSS: Don't hide and don't mark.
Offer sample CSS or a configuration item in Display Settings, i.e. .badnode:before{ content: "Disputed: " }

If it is acceptable to just hide the content from AM (it's still in the source HTML), tagging might be good enough to reduce the implementation workload to just tagging plus CSS. However, search engines (and notorious HTML source readers) might still find bad nodes. Not sure if this is an issue, though.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors
by jdporter (Paladin) on Jul 25, 2018 at 17:32 UTC

    Nice idea! Good point, though... We wouldn't want robots to see this stuff either (e.g. Google).

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1219275]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-03-28 18:25 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found