Re^2: is Plack really necessary?

In your diagram of the simplistic deployment stack, I notice a distinct lack of layers labeled "Plack". Or is your overall point that "Plack" really just means "any arbitrary implementation of PSGI"?

Comment on Re^2: is Plack really necessary?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: is Plack really necessary? by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Apr 26, 2018 at 16:19 UTC
Yes. We only happen to have one and it lives in Plack:: but it's just a PSGI implementation/harness; just like CGI.pm is a CGI spec implementation. I'm glad miyagawa chose to keep the names separate though I suppose both approaches have some points of confusion.	[reply]


There's more than one way to do things
	PerlMonks