Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Curious about Perl's strengths in 2018

by haukex (Bishop)
on Apr 12, 2018 at 12:49 UTC ( #1212733=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Curious about Perl's strengths in 2018

Perl is IMO still very powerful in the areas it has always been powerful in: text processing (regexes etc.), system administration, web development, and so on. Glancing over at *NIX help forums today shows that people are still getting a lot done with sed, awk, and perl one-liners. It's also come into use in the bioinformatics world, AFAIK for its power in handling text files. But Perl has also grown a significant amount:

what are hot items on CPAN these days?

Just to name a few "modern" ones:

Although not exactly new, there are some other nice frameworks/libraries that IMO make Perl more "modern":

Probably other monks can point out some of the "big ones" I've missed - see also Task::Kensho for even more modules. In general, I think even many of the modules that have been around for a really long time have matured to the point where they are more robust, have good test suites, etc. (e.g. Template, just to name one of many) - either that, or, in some cases, are now generally recommended against or deprecated.

Various minor edits, and updates as indicated.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Curious about Perl's strengths in 2018
by Crosis (Beadle) on Apr 13, 2018 at 01:03 UTC

    Great recommendations.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1212733]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (2)
As of 2020-10-25 06:59 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My favourite web site is:












    Results (249 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?