good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
Re: Anonymous Monk comment(s) on questionsby marinersk (Priest) |
on May 25, 2017 at 15:26 UTC ( [id://1191223]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Constraint is not in keeping with the spirit of the Monastery; that's been covered well enough. The comments to which you refer are also, in my humble but arrogant opinion, not particularly well-aligned with the spirit of the Monastery, either; each one of those reminds me of jeffa as he was losing his marbles and maturity a little ways back. However, censorship carried too far is also not in the spirit of the Monastery; the usual approach by most experienced Monks in most of these situations seems to be to quietly tolerate and ignore the trolls. I took a heavier hand during jeffa's diarrhetic explosion, and apparently many Monks agreed because many of those nodes got downvoted, considered, and, if memory serves, reaped. But it felt out of place in the Monastery, and even jeffa himself questioned whether Perlmonks had become intolerant of opinion. It was a ludicrous example, but a valid question, and I later resolved to return to the policy of simply ignoring the troll. I do find value in seeing the question addressed by the more senior Monks, if they'd care to take the time. Do we want to "police" the unfriendly and unhelpful nodes, or is ignoring them still in the best interests of the Monastery from their perspective?
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|