Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: [OT] Thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator?

by sundialsvc4 (Abbot)
on May 17, 2017 at 15:51 UTC ( [id://1190474]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to [OT] Thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator?

While I am generally nervous about adding to the venerable regular-expression syntax, why not wait and see if this feature gains traction in Ruby-land?   If people actually find it useful, they will vote with their fingers as they write new source code that uses it.   If that actually happens, it can be added to Perl 5/6 easily enough.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: [OT] Thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator?
by Anonymous Monk on May 17, 2017 at 17:18 UTC
    "venerable regular-expression syntax" and "vote with their fingers" ... you are trying very hard to sound clever.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1190474]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-25 06:44 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found