good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
Re: [OT] Thoughts on Ruby's new absent operator?by sundialsvc4 (Abbot) |
on May 17, 2017 at 15:51 UTC ( [id://1190474]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
While I am generally nervous about adding to the venerable regular-expression syntax, why not wait and see if this feature gains traction in Ruby-land? If people actually find it useful, they will vote with their fingers as they write new source code that uses it. If that actually happens, it can be added to Perl 5/6 easily enough.
In Section
Meditations
|
|