Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical

Re^6: Restricting Anonymous Monk to SOPW (board policy)

by LanX (Sage)
on May 14, 2017 at 21:36 UTC ( #1190280=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^5: Restricting Anonymous Monk to SOPW (board policy)
in thread Restricting Anonymous Monk to SOPW

> But why worry about rude attacks from AM? Do they harm you; your kids; your relationships; or your future?

I've already met some people who avoid PM because of the "tone", I mean also active contributors who blog or post on stackoverflow.

It's sad to loose quality in exchange for some psychos and aggro nerds.

Well whatever, I think it can't be helped.

We need to settle on the level of badly formated FASTA questions and alike.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!

update: fixed typo (Discipulus++ :)

  • Comment on Re^6: Restricting Anonymous Monk to SOPW (board policy)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1190280]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (4)
As of 2021-11-27 12:38 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found