Re^2: Perl Developer Survey 2017 results are available

> I was a little surprised to see no mention at all of Padre in the IDE responses, given various monks' support for it here.

The pie-charts are strange, the text lists emacs as second most popular IDE but doesn't show in the graphics.

Additionally asking if they use the editor exclusively would have been nice.

From my personal experience most emacs user use it exclusively, while most VI(M) user I met mix it (depending on plattform and/or use case)

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)

Je suis Charlie!}

Comment on Re^2: Perl Developer Survey 2017 results are available

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Perl Developer Survey 2017 results are available by choroba (Cardinal) on Apr 27, 2017 at 15:28 UTC
> emacs were very popular in the other section, with 138 responses I understand it as Emacs winning the "Other" section with 138/355 votes. Another nice thing is the mention of data dumber as the favourite debugging tool. ($q=q:Sq=~/;[c](.)(.)/;chr(-\|\|-\|5+lengthSq)`"S\|oS2"`map{chr \|+ord }map{substrSq`S_+\|`\|}3E\|-\|`7**2-3:)=~y+S\|`+$1,++print+eval$q,q,a, [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Perl Developer Survey 2017 results are available (wrong math) by LanX (Saint) on Apr 27, 2017 at 15:43 UTC
That too. But the math is wrong anyway, how can emacs have less total but more percentage than sublime + atom together ? ? ? lol > Emacs ... that translates to 16.25% ...138 responses > Next comes Sublime with 7.7% ( "total 85" in chart) > followed by Atom with 7.1% ("total 78" in chart) Brings me back to an evergreen: "I only believe in statistics that I doctored myself. " (German proverb) Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]
Re^4: Perl Developer Survey 2017 results are available by stevieb (Canon) on Apr 27, 2017 at 16:29 UTC
"Another nice thing is the mention of data dumber as the favourite debugging tool." hahaha so I wasn't the only one who caught that ;)	[reply]


Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
	PerlMonks