Re^7: Rand'n'Brand

there is no infinite (=eternal) division: it stops at the quantum level.

If you have to resort to quantum physical arguments to make your case, you already lost! :)

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^7: Rand'n'Brand

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: Rand'n'Brand by shmem (Chancellor) on Mar 30, 2017 at 22:00 UTC
That hasn't been resorting to, but underpinning the argument :) (and the point of that underpinning is that even something as simple as motion is binary) perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'	[reply]
Re^9: Rand'n'Brand by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 30, 2017 at 22:14 UTC
even something as simple as motion is binary) Which direction does 1 represent? With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity. In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^10: Rand'n'Brand by shmem (Chancellor) on Mar 30, 2017 at 22:17 UTC
Which direction does 1 represent? Towards a point on the sphere, the starting point being the center, the name of the direction is based on convention. In time, either of 2. edit: in binary - `$start ? 0 : 1` perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'	[reply] [d/l]