Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

by Arunbear (Prior)
on Mar 11, 2017 at 12:47 UTC ( [id://1184267]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?
in thread Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

The page I linked to earlier mentions that
In the new paper, which the scientists plan to put forward to the IAU, the current definition is described as "technically flawed" - it only recognises planets as objects that are orbiting our Sun and not other stars. It also says the need for zone-clearing means "no planet in our Solar System" meets the criteria for planets.

The authors argue the new definition is "geophysical" and based on the physics of the world itself.

So e.g. if the positions of Earth and Pluto were swapped, the Earth would no longer be a planet according to the IAU's definition.

The paper they refer to is short and readable.
  • Comment on Re^2: Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1184267]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-19 01:13 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found