Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked

(Ovid) Re(2): Another Q about piping Perl

by Ovid (Cardinal)
on Oct 12, 2001 at 03:39 UTC ( #118370=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Another Q about piping Perl
in thread Another Q about piping Perl

stefp wrote:

Some people consider using map on empty context is bad form. I don't.

I think it depends on the context. If you're doing a short one-liner like that, it's not a big deal. In fact, if you're just writing a small "throw away" script that only gets used once or twice and you don't care about performance or memory, then it's not a big deal IMHO. However, if you're writing large applications, it pays to be rigorous. Creating a bunch of only to throw away the return value is a waste of resources and a for loop is preferable. Doing what you did to print all the files in the $HOME/MAIL/ directory:

# print all files in the directory (an overblown and limited 'ls' +or 'dir' perl -e '-f $_ and print "$_ " for glob(shift)' ./*

Side note: since I tested that on a Windows box and it doesn't like single quotes on the command line and I hate using \" all the time to embed quotes, I wrote this:

perl -e "-f $_ and print $_.$,.$/ for glob(shift)" ./*

No wonder people say Perl has too much punctuation :)


Update: Hmm... seems I wasn't paying attention to blakem's post.

Vote for paco!

Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just click on the the link and check out our stats.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://118370]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (5)
As of 2022-05-29 12:13 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?

    Results (101 votes). Check out past polls.