Re^1: Testing Wrapped LDAP Classes

Hi stevieb, thanks for your answer! This looks really good and I tried to integrate this into my code. Yet I still have problems...

I have a subroutine in my program called like this:

sub search_ldap {                                                     
+                                                                     
+                                                                 
    my ( $self, $ldap ) = @_; 
 
    # get uid, email, ecufreeze, cnum, itimaccess from LDAP
    report LOG_INFO, "Reading from Ldap";
    unless (
             $ldap->searchUser( filter     => '(uid=*)',
                                attributes => "freeze uid dn cnum emai
+l" ) ) 
    {   
        report LOG_ERROR, "Can not list user from LDAP: " . $ldap->get
+Error();
        exit 0;
    }   
 
    return $ldap;
 
}
[download]

In this case $ldap is a Utils::Ldap::CompanyLdap object. when calling $ldap->searchUser this object writes the users into itself. So with the searchUser call, the object itself is altered.

What I tried:

my $m = Mock::Sub->new;                 
my $ldap = Utils::Ldap::CompanyLdap->new;                             
+                                                                     
+                                                                     
+       
                                     
my $mocked_sub = $m->mock(           
    'Utils::Ldap::CompanyLdap::searchUser'
);     

# This is actually a Utils::Ldap::CompanyLdap-Object I copied via Data
+::Dumper
my $return_value = bless ( ... ); 
                                     
$mocked_sub->return_value($return_value);
    
    # cache is an instance of my own object                           
+  
    ok( $cache->search_ldap($my_ldap) );
                                     
    ok( $cache->read_all_userids($my_ldap) );
                                     
is $mocked_sub->called, 1, "searchUser() called ok";
[download]

I was hoping that be putting the object the way I want it to into my return value, the solution would work. The thing is, I noticed searchUser doesn't really return anything, it only appends to the object-instance. So Mock::Sub returns the right thing, but the code continues to work with the old ldap-object. Any Ideas how to solve this?

Greetings and thanks for your insights so far,
yulivee

Comment on Re^1: Testing Wrapped LDAP Classes Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Testing Wrapped LDAP Classes
by stevieb (Canon) on Dec 06, 2016 at 14:58 UTC

This is what the side_effect() functionality does... allows you to do stuff (eg: modify an object) when there's no need for a return. Here's an example:

use warnings;
use strict;

package Thing; {
    sub new {
        return bless {}, shift;
    }
    sub modify {
        my ($self) = @_;
        $self->{modified} = 'modified by original sub';
    }
}

package main;

use Data::Dumper;
use Mock::Sub;
use Test::More;

my $m = Mock::Sub->new;
my $thing = Thing->new;

my $modify_sub = $m->mock('Thing::modify');

$modify_sub->side_effect(
    sub {
        my $obj = shift;
        $obj->{modified} = 'modified by mocked sub';
    }
);

print "before mocked sub called...\n\n";

print Dumper $thing;

$thing->modify;

print "\n\nafter  mocked sub called...\n\n";
print Dumper $thing;

print "\n\n";

is defined $thing->{modified}, 1, "obj was modified ok";
like $thing->{modified}, qr/mocked sub/, "obj was changed by mock";
is $modify_sub->called, 1, "mocked sub called ok";

done_testing();
[download]

Output:

before mocked sub called...

$VAR1 = bless( {}, 'Thing' );


after  mocked sub called...

$VAR1 = bless( {
                 'modified' => 'modified by mocked sub'
               }, 'Thing' );


ok 1 - obj was modified ok
ok 2 - obj was changed by mock
ok 3 - mocked sub called ok
1..3
[download]

So, there's no return anymore. The side_effect() code reference will get all parameters passed in as they were sent in to the real sub call (in this case, $self, as it's the only param on the method call. We then have the side effect add a new hash key to itself and assign it a value. After side effect is complete, the main object is updated just like the original function would have done, without having to call the real function.

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks