Are we lacking behind in YAML spec versions?


go ahead... be a heretic
	PerlMonks

Are we lacking behind in YAML spec versions?

by mikkoi (Beadle)

on Dec 02, 2016 at 16:55 UTC ( [id://1177109]=perlquestion: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

mikkoi has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

The new API description language RAML uses YAML 1.2 as file format. But it seems that neither YAML, YAML::Tiny, YAML::XS nor YAML::Syck support YAML 1.2 spec, only 1.1. And 1.1 came out already in 2009. Situation can't be this?

Comment on Are we lacking behind in YAML spec versions?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Are we lacking behind in YAML spec versions? by marto (Cardinal) on Dec 02, 2016 at 17:39 UTC
http://raml.org/projects/projects lists https://github.com/spq-easy/raml under Perl. The YAML 1.2 spec states: "The primary objective of this revision is to bring YAML into compliance with JSON as an official subset. YAML 1.2 is compatible with 1.1 for most practical applications." You'd have to check the fine points of the documentation to find out if the differences have a substantial impact.	[reply]
Re: Are we lacking behind in YAML spec versions? by mikkoi (Beadle) on Dec 03, 2016 at 12:35 UTC
I submitted a bug report (https://github.com/ingydotnet/yaml-pm/issues/167) to YAML's Gitlab repo. Read more... (1049 Bytes) The Perl project mentioned on RAML's website (https://github.com/spq-easy/RAML) uses YAML::Syck which uses libsyck which is compatible with YAML 1.1.	[reply] [d/l]

Back to Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: perlquestion [id://1177109]
Approved by stevieb
Front-paged by Corion
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others meditating upon the Monastery: (7)

As of 2024-04-25 08:29 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Today I Learned

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found