Re^2: Best Nodes with negative reputation

I'm not sure but it seems that nodes are only included after they've been voted on, such that neutral nodes are omitted.

That is nodes with 0 votes are only shown when up and downs happened and equalized.

But showing neutral nodes should soften this effect considerably.. .

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)

Je suis Charlie!}

improved wording

Comment on Re^2: Best Nodes with negative reputation

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Best Nodes with negative reputation by jdporter (Paladin) on Aug 02, 2016 at 13:50 UTC
Could you write a patch? TIA... I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.	[reply]
Re^4: Best Nodes with negative reputation by LanX (Saint) on Aug 02, 2016 at 16:46 UTC
I'd love to, but I don't really understand get_picked_nodes Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]
Re^5: Best Nodes with negative reputation by jdporter (Paladin) on Aug 02, 2016 at 17:24 UTC
Ha ha! Neither do I. :-D But I'm thinking maybe we should revisit the whole idea of having "Best Nodes" lists. Why do we have them? If it's to serve as motivation, to get people to try to create the best nodes they can, then I'd say we should probably have a lower rep bound somewhat higher than zero. How "awesome" does it feel to make the "Best Nodes of the Day" list with a node that only has 5 rep? Maybe the lower bound could be based on $NORM... I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.	[reply]
Re^6: Best Nodes with negative reputation by LanX (Saint) on Aug 07, 2016 at 17:17 UTC


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks