What I say is that introducing a completely new game like poker is like manipulating the DNA of PM, with a high risk of lethal mutations and raptures of the force.

My primary source is RAT view, too.

But I was talking about votes and yes _reps_˛ XPs have biases!

But XPs˛ are not really important, or do you think that BUK is better or more influential or (...fill in ...) than you?

XPs˛ are meant to keep people interested and to manage certain basic achievable rights.

I showed a way to find votes per reply-level, now you could bother to rank monks by "votes per level" by elaborating a weight factor a for a reply level, and thus compute a new (but alternative) ranking. (good luck!)

Actually I think that's a rather academic discussion since we have more urgent problems.

update

˛) confusion fixed

updated

most probably we meant different things, never mind.