Re^2: Catalyst versionning


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks

Re^2: Catalyst versionning

by QuillMeantTen (Friar)

on May 07, 2016 at 09:41 UTC ( [id://1162434]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Catalyst versionning
in thread Catalyst versionning

I read your answer right away but I had to spend at least a night sleeping on it before it started making sense. I, for now, do not have enough experience in the field to apply your advice immediatly but thanks for the guideline and telling me where (and more importantly, how) to look.

Comment on Re^2: Catalyst versionning

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: Catalyst versionning
by RonW (Parson) on May 09, 2016 at 17:15 UTC

Real world example to help you understand:

Some of the source code for our projects is generated from Math Lab models. If we didn't push the source code generated from those models, building would require having Math Lab and the code generation tools installed. These are both very expensive, so the company, understandably, wants to only provide it to the developers who actually do the modeling.

Other reasons for pushing generated code include the use of custom tools to generate the code. Sometimes such tools are difficult to support. Other times, they must be kept private for various reasons.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom