Just another Perl shrine | |
PerlMonks |
Re^8: How would you code this?by BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
on Apr 08, 2016 at 19:24 UTC ( [id://1159959]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Kenneth, thanks for your continued explorations. I've been looking at this most of the day, and I think I finally made a decision. Looking in detail at the differences between the original data (red), my original algorithm (blue); graff's agorithm (black) and your latest algorithm (green); there is one place where I think your algorithm is clearly superior: the bottom left corner of the top right zoom, where your algorithm splits the difference between mine and graff's; and I think is clearly a better reflection of the underlying trend of the original data. However, as you pointed out, it does 'invent' points, which neither of the other two do. I also agree that in most other cases yours has a tendency to bias high. So after much umming and aahing, I'm going with graffs algorithm. Thanks. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|