Re^4: Why is the null while-loop condition expression true?

the idea of ever writing while(){} to mean… all the enclosed code is just for laughs because I never want it to run is even sillier.

Hm. That would mean if( 0 ) & while( 0 ) were silly also, yet the Perl sources, amongst many others, are littered with innumerable examples of both.

Countering a conclusion, because it happens to have been drawn by me, is the very definition of "silly".

In every other case empty parens () mean false; to deem while() to mean the opposite, is...; well, it starts with s and is somewhat stronger than "silly".

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^4: Why is the null while-loop condition expression true? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Why is the null while-loop condition expression true? by soonix (Canon) on Mar 29, 2016 at 08:28 UTC
it starts with s and is somewhat stronger than "silly". … "sinconsistent"? Ah, no, "sinful" :-)	[reply]


Do you know where your variables are?
	PerlMonks