Re: Loop through array of hashes

Why not use a function for that?

use strict;
use warnings;

my %foo = ( one => 1, two => 2 );
my %bar = ( three => 3, four => 4 );
my %baz = ( five => 5, six => 6 );

dump_keys( $_ ) for \%foo, \%bar, \%baz;

sub dump_keys { print "$_\n" for keys %{+shift} }
[download]

Update: I am using ONE list without the need to wrap it in an array.

jeffa

L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)

Comment on Re: Loop through array of hashes Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Loop through array of hashes by GotToBTru (Prior) on Jan 21, 2016 at 20:42 UTC
~~It's that classic blunder, less well known than getting involved in a land war in Asia: use of numbered variables instead of an array! Especially when the OP calls for it.~~ `use strict; use warnings; my @aoh; push @aoh, { one => 1, two => 2 }; push @aoh, { three => 3, four => 4 }; push @aoh, { five => 5, six => 6 }; dump_keys( $_ ) for @aoh; sub dump_keys { print "$_\n" for keys %{+shift} }` [download] Update: jeffa has since revised his answer to make my comment irrelevant. But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Romans 5:8 (NASB)	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: Loop through array of hashes by Anonymous Monk on Jan 21, 2016 at 21:49 UTC
Why don't you harass the other responses with your pedantry? Everyone in this post used numbered variables because the context was something else --- taking a reference. Please, learn how to read.	[reply]


go ahead... be a heretic
	PerlMonks