Re^4: warnings pragma anomaly


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks

by choroba (Cardinal)

on Oct 19, 2015 at 22:25 UTC ( [id://1145360]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

I usually don't run modules, I use them. No warning is produced in such situations.

لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ

Comment on Re^4: warnings pragma anomaly

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: warnings pragma anomaly by muba (Priest) on Oct 19, 2015 at 23:22 UTC
True. But before we even start talking about unit tests, it would be nice to have `perl -wc Foo.pm` [download] at least come up with the "Foo.pm syntax ok" message and without raising any warnings. Given `package Foo; 42;` [download] this would give "syntax ok" but also the "useless use of constant in void context" warning, whereas `package Foo; 1;` [download] would only give the "syntax ok" message.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^6: warnings pragma anomaly by choroba (Cardinal) on Oct 20, 2015 at 07:45 UTC
You can still do `perl -MFoo -wce1` [download] لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: warnings pragma anomaly by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 19, 2015 at 22:40 UTC
Good point :)	[reply]

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://1145360]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others romping around the Monastery: (4)

As of 2024-04-24 17:31 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found