Silly me ... I thought monkdiscuss aka PMD was meant for open discussions. ..
| [reply] |
At the time of its creation, Inner Scriptorium was more geared toward progress in the Monastery's code base, where PMD was more geared toward policy, wishlist suggestions, and such. So one was more technical in nature, and the other more social.
| [reply] |
So there is no section for internal discussion?
From my experience similar sections rather tend to be closed or joined, hard to see a future for both sections side by side.
OTOH are the guts of PM so complicated and special that they deserve an internal group section.
Not only to discuss sensible stuff like anti spam mechanisms but also to be protected from needless trolling.
| [reply] |
I think LanX's question raises a valid point. Should the Inner Scriptorium be publicly readable or only by logged in monks? | [reply] |
Logged in wasn't exactly my point. :)
Those not belonging to cabal can't easily follow discussions if restricted links are posted (wiki , special nodes and so on)
How should I discuss content which is considered disclosed?
Besides the pmdev wiki explicitly says that discussions should be done on the inner scriptorium.
I haven't seen much discussion here, and I think that's because others have the same problem.
| [reply] |