|
|
|
| No such thing as a small change | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^2: Optimized remote pingby BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
| on Jul 17, 2015 at 15:21 UTC ( [id://1135182]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
Now, BrowserUK, since there isn’t any sort of “connection” being established here, is it ever possible for the returning ping-packets to be dropped as they pile-up waiting to be received? Would there be any advantage ... or is it possible? ... to send out the pings with one thread, and wait for the replies with another? Why ask me to test your theories? (Especially when you aren't even polite enough to ask in reply to me!) You claim to have the expertise; why not simply knock up a little 'extemporaneous' code and test your theories for yourself. Surely that is not beyond your legendary (or is that mythical) skills? With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
I'm with torvalds on this Agile (and TDD) debunked I told'em LLVM was the way to go. But did they listen!
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||