http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=1131275


in reply to Random shuffling

Looks fine to me, but the best way would be to verify it yourself, print out the before & after sequences below each other and change the window size to something readable (e.g. 5).

That said, I think the problem maybe miss-represented, are you sure you dont want to break up the DNA into window-sized chunks and shuffle the chunks? This would be a more useful exercise!

Update: ...SO VERY different from what has been published
It would be nice to see a link to the published work!

This is not a Signature...