Re^4: Question about the most efficient way to read Apache log files without All-In-One Modules from CPAN (personal learning exercise)


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks

Re^4: Question about the most efficient way to read Apache log files without All-In-One Modules from CPAN (personal learning exercise)

by Anonymous Monk

on Jun 18, 2015 at 00:36 UTC ( [id://1130915]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: Question about the most efficient way to read Apache log files without All-In-One Modules from CPAN (personal learning exercise)
in thread Question about the most efficient way to read Apache log files without All-In-One Modules from CPAN (personal learning exercise)

See also "re-inventing the wheel." This applies less to a learning exercise than production code produced under time pressure.

So GotToBTru is sundialsvc4 ?

How does that answer the question Who are you quoting there?

Comment on Re^4: Question about the most efficient way to read Apache log files without All-In-One Modules from CPAN (personal learning exercise)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Question about the most efficient way to read Apache log files without All-In-One Modules from CPAN (personal learning exercise) by GotToBTru (Prior) on Jun 18, 2015 at 03:20 UTC
He's quoting himself apparently. He's said that about 38 times since 7/13/06. Unsure of the origin or age of the wheel version. I was answering the other question :) Dum Spiro Spero	[reply]
Re^6: Question about the most efficient way to read Apache log files without All-In-One Modules from CPAN (personal learning exercise) by Anonymous Monk on Jun 18, 2015 at 08:14 UTC
Thing is: there were other languages, and other scripting languages before Larry Wall wrote Perl. Are we glad he did a thing already done? There was CGI, before mod_perl, before Catalyst, before Plack, before PSGI. Should they have stopped at CGI?	[reply]
Re^7: Question about the most efficient way to read Apache log files without All-In-One Modules from CPAN (personal learning exercise) by GotToBTru (Prior) on Jun 18, 2015 at 17:24 UTC
Don't mistake adding explanation for endorsement :) But I dare say the originators of thing[n+1] would be insulted if you insisted they were merely recreating thing[n]. Dum Spiro Spero	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Log In^?

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://1130915]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others rifling through the Monastery: (8)

As of 2024-04-19 12:51 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Today I Learned

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found