http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=1129976

A few numbers:

node number: date: days: 100,000 26/07/2001 200,000 23/09/2002 424 300,000 17/10/2003 389 400,000 17/10/2004 366 500,000 13/10/2005 361 600,000 14/02/2007 489 700,000 24/07/2008 526 800,000 08/10/2009 441 900,000 18/04/2011 557 1000,000 19/10/2012 550 1100,000 09/09/2014 690 ... 1130,000 11/06/2015 275 today. ... 1200,000 14/03/2017 (917)(projected) 1300,000 17/09/2020 (1283)(projected)

Those are the dates on which the N-hundred-thousanth node was posted; and the number of days to accumulate that 100,000 posts.

Today we will likely reach 1,130,000. It will have taken 275 days to do so. projecting forward, 275 / 3 * 10 = 917 means it will be another 2 years before this place reaches the next 100,000 milestone.

It took 25% more days to accumulate the 11th 100,000 than it did the tenth.

Based on the projection, it will take 32% longer for the 12th than it did the 11th.

And projecting that rate of decline forward means that we won't reach the 13th milestone until September 2020.

You don't want to know about the one after that; because it won't happen.

There are 2 choices

  1. Do something.

    Open our minds. Invite new blood. Fight to retain (or even return) old blood.

    Change something.

  2. Do nothing.

    Continue as we are; cloistered in our declining; deteriorating; smug little world.

    And die!

Your choice guys. I've tried to liven this place up. Posted what I hoped would be interesting questions. Proposed change. Taken the insults.

Now its down to the rest of you. Hide in the shadows pouring scorn and derision upon any and every suggestion. Or stand up and be counted.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked