XP is just a number | |
PerlMonks |
Re^6: Heap structure for lookup?by BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
on May 27, 2015 at 11:42 UTC ( [id://1127981]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
What I've come up with is a very simple & compact hash implementation:
The insertion rate of 150e6 (into a fixed-size array of just over 200e6) is less that 1/4 microsecond per; or 37 second for them all; which is fine. If I push the number of inserts to 190e6, you can visibly see -- watching the trace of every 1e6th insertion -- the insertion rate slow down; but still the insertion rate is less than 1/2 a microsecond per. The lookups, currently done manually by feeding some of the values traced out back in to check they are found, and a few off-the-top-of-my-head other numbers to check they aren't, and the lookup time is around 20 microseconds per, including the perl->XS->perl transitions and conversions. Which is also very acceptable:
All together, I'm really surprised that such a simple hash implementation should work quite so well; even allowing for a 25% to 10% headroom in the array. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
I'm with torvalds on this
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|