I attacked no one.

From Re^6: MJDs Contract Warnings - courtesy of Perlweekly "you are the problem" (amongst other comments.)

And you're intervention is unwarranted and unhelpful.

As the thread started because of a comment that i made and subsequently considered a reply, i feel quite involved. And, i refuse to stand by idly as you berate a fellow monk for asking a poignant question.

I attacked no one. From Re^6: MJDs Contract Warnings - courtesy of Perlweekly "you are the problem"

Is the statement: 'If you're not a part of the solution; then you're a part of the problem' an "attack" in your eyes?

If so, then you've just condemned just about every motivational speaker on the planet.

. And, i refuse to stand by idly as you berate a fellow monk for asking a poignant question.

You're defending arunbear from an imaginary "attack". There is no "attack", only a discussion. A response to his question.

He asked; I answered. You half read, took stuff out of context, and reacted. You made exactly the same mistake he did.

---

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked