http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11149740


in reply to Re: Is there a concerted effort to break CPAN for older perl versions to drive support for v7?
in thread Is there a concerted effort to break CPAN for older perl versions to drive support for v7?

I will also raise the bar to make development easier.

Got a good example(s)? The blog in question made a philosophical stance

  • Comment on Re^2: Is there a concerted effort to break CPAN for older perl versions to drive support for v7?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Is there a concerted effort to break CPAN for older perl versions to drive support for v7?
by cavac (Vicar) on Feb 02, 2023 at 12:53 UTC

    Got a good example(s)?

    Better boolean support in Perl 5.36

    Also:

    The 5.36 bundle enables the signatures feature. Introduced in Perl ver +sion 5.20.0, and modified several times since, the subroutine signatu +res feature is now no longer considered experimental. It is now consi +dered a stable language feature and no longer prints a warning.

    PerlMonks XP is useless? Not anymore: XPD - Do more with your PerlMonks XP
      Boolean LOL. Signatures indeed.