Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re: New version of Mod_perl

by stonecolddevin (Parson)
on Jan 29, 2015 at 20:48 UTC ( [id://1114972]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Performance comparison Apache/FastCGI/Plack vs Apache/FCGI vs Plack standalone vs Apache/mod_perl (was "New version of Mod_perl")

How tightly coupled to mod_perl are you? In my experience, there are far, far better options out there, and the Perl community in general kind of winces when people bring up supporting mod_perl.

Three thousand years of beautiful tradition, from Moses to Sandy Koufax, you're god damn right I'm living in the fucking past

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: New version of Mod_perl
by adamarc (Initiate) on Jan 29, 2015 at 21:34 UTC
    My site is a high traffic site that uses mod_perl only for the following reasons:
    - performance since all code is precompiled
    - persistent database connections (DBI is overloaded by Apache::DBI to do this)
    - good UTF8 support
    - code does not need to be rewritten. It overloads the CGI object

    I've considered the following modules:
    FCGI: does not support multi-byte chars properly (it is not Unicode aware and only characters within the range 0x00-0xFF are supported)
    FastCGI: no persistent database connections. UTF8 support?
    Plack: requires refactoring of the code. I couldn't find persistent database connection support in the man pages.

    Did I miss a solution? Thank you for your reply. I'm curious to find out about your thoughts.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1114972]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-19 11:54 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found