![]() |
|
Don't ask to ask, just ask | |
PerlMonks |
Re^3: What's the point of this 'overload' idiom?by stevieb (Canon) |
on Dec 07, 2022 at 07:33 UTC ( #11148643=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
shift->name
Is a lazy man's way of saying:
In other words, it's a quick way of not declaring the 'self' variable. I do it a different way if I have a one line sub:
...the following is equivalent:
When a Perl method receives its parameters, the first one is always the calling object. shift or $_[0] is the same thing; the object itself. If a method is more than one line, I prefer to collect the parameter as self (eg. my ($self) = @_;). That's not always the case. Note that shift->thing; only works once... once you've shifted the object off the stack, you can't call shift again. In these cases, $_[0] is better, but if you have to use $_[0] more than once, you're far better off for self-documenting purposes to use my ($self) = @_;.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|