Re^2: having a container on perl VMs is good ?

in reply to Re: having a container on perl VMs is good ?
in thread having a container on perl VMs is good ?

Another option that i nearly always use* is Net::Clacks. It allows asyncronous message broadcasting between processes. It also supports storing values on the Net::Clacks Server, similar to memcached. It supports network and Unix domain sockets (for better speed).

* I developed that thing. Yeah shameless self promotion here, sue me...

PerlMonks XP is useless? Not anymore: XPD - Do more with your PerlMonks XP

Comment on Re^2: having a container on perl VMs is good ?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: having a container on perl VMs is good ? by kcott (Archbishop) on Nov 17, 2022 at 16:37 UTC
Yes, although it would've been a while ago now, I do remember you posting that. The Discworld: Going Postal reference was not lost on me. :-) — Ken	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom