Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: having a container on perl VMs is good ?

by cavac (Parson)
on Nov 17, 2022 at 15:29 UTC ( [id://11148224]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: having a container on perl VMs is good ?
in thread having a container on perl VMs is good ?

Another option that i nearly always use* is Net::Clacks. It allows asyncronous message broadcasting between processes. It also supports storing values on the Net::Clacks Server, similar to memcached. It supports network and Unix domain sockets (for better speed).

* I developed that thing. Yeah shameless self promotion here, sue me...

PerlMonks XP is useless? Not anymore: XPD - Do more with your PerlMonks XP
  • Comment on Re^2: having a container on perl VMs is good ?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: having a container on perl VMs is good ?
by kcott (Archbishop) on Nov 17, 2022 at 16:37 UTC

    Yes, although it would've been a while ago now, I do remember you posting that. The Discworld: Going Postal reference was not lost on me. :-)

    — Ken

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11148224]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others admiring the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-25 23:36 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found